
In explanation of the picture after an uproar over the cover, PW offered this on their website:
The image was a photograph taken from a new book from W.W. Norton, Posing Beauty: African American Images from the 1890s to the Present by Deborah Willis, a collection of carefully chosen photographs intended to highlight the physical and cultural beauty of African-American life. The image (Pickin’, 1999) by Lauren Kelley is a photograph of a black woman whose hair is full of Afro picks, the ubiquitous metal toothed hair-comb of the 1970s, complete with plastic handle in the form of a black power fist. The afro picks are arrayed in the woman’s hair to create a kind of giant sculptural Afro hair-do and the woman is leaning slightly forward to give the viewer a better look at the quirky artificially created hair-pick crown. The coverline for the image is: Afro Picks! New Books and Trends in African-American Publishing and it refers to the feature story “African-American Books in Today’s Marketplace,” a look at the current marketplace for black books written by Felicia Pride.
The resulting response to the choice of that particular image and that coverline was not anticipated by the person most closely involved with this week’s cover. That person was me, PW senior news editor, Calvin Reid. I organize, edit, and oversee the annual feature story on black books. I chose the cover in collaboration with the magazine’s creative director and I wrote the coverline, Afro Picks!, which was intended as a pun to highlight a story that “picked” new black titles of interest. The image was reminiscent of the 1970s and appealed to me, someone who grew up in the middle of the 1970s-era wave of black pride, black power and big afros with big afro picks stuck right in the back. To me it is a sweet, tongue-in-cheek funny and striking image of quirky black hair power. And while it never occurred to me that anyone would be offended by these images, I was very wrong and I have to acknowledge that. Quite a few people were offended by it and outraged by what some perceive as a disparaging or degrading image of a black woman. I certainly regret offending anyone and while I still love that image, I intend to think long and hard about whatever image is chosen for next year’s cover.
“My apologies to anyone who was offended by our cover—that certainly wasn’t our intent,” said PW’s editorial director, Brian Kenney. “At the same time, I’m delighted that Publishers Weekly was able to draw so much attention to Lauren Kelley’s powerful photograph, Deborah Willis’s wonderful book, and especially Felicia Pride’s absolutely terrific feature on African-American book publishing.”
In an effort to respond to the complaints, I contacted W.W. Norton executive editor Bob Weil, who edited the book from which the photo was taken. He wanted to emphasize that “this is a positive and transformational book.” He recently spoke at an event promoting the book at the Studio Museum in Harlem and said, “Willis’s book goes miles to show a more complete and honest history of the black image. One man stood up in the audience and said he’s using the book therapeutically with his psychiatric in-patients at Bellevue to improve their self-esteem; another young woman stood up and said she came upon the book by accident and was amazed to discover a book that reflected the world she knew.”
And with all due respect to those who were offended by the image, that is not a universal reaction. In an e-mail message from professor Willis, a scholar of black photography, chair of NYU’s photography department and a MacArthur Fellow, wrote: “It’s amazing how the viewers read this wonderful image that exemplifies power, humor, style, and beauty. Including the fist on the comb indicates power and strength and pride. It reminded me of the 70s. Ironic could it be that the readers are afraid to look at the power in black hair. (smile.) Thank you for using the image and exposing Black Beauty.”






{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
I don’t get whats offensive or bad about the photo….Looks creative and cool, goes with the pun of the title….people are offended over EVERYTHING, so no surprise really. Put a picture of a black cat on the cover and that’s racist too
African-American authors, who feel marginalized by the publishing industry, are the ones offended by this cover. They want their work accepted and treated the same way as “mainstream” or white writers. Covers such as this do not help their cause, but seems to invite further division. As if books penned by black authors are only for black readers with the pun “Afro Picks.” This limits black authors. It’s not about the cover, which is fine, as far as I’m concerned. It’s about the context. And where it was used–Publishers Weekly. Check out the following blog link post below and its comments for details on why this cover is considered a “race fail” by some.
http://www.blogher.com/black-writers-fail-publishers-weeklys-afro-pick-cover
Read
http://www.blogher.com/black-writers-fail-publishers-weeklys-afro-pick-cover
I posted a link to a blog that tries to explain why black authors find this photo offensive. I think you should read both sides, not just Publishers Weekly’s side. It’s not the photo, but the context.
I really like the cover. I thought it was beautiful in an artsy way! I don’t at all get what’s “bad” about it.
i think it looks kinda cool
Wow, I’m so shocked that he had to apologize. I got the pun immediately and I also thought the picture was amazing! What’s degrading about it, I’d like to know?
i would love to hear what some of those negative comments were and what the uproar was about. it’s an artistic photo that was used for a magazine article. a huge WTF!!!! i think the cover is great!
ok i just read some of the link posted by demi and i am disturbed more-so by the responses of the people who are offended by the photo. why is naked black woman considered tribal? when i get out of the shower in the morning, there’s no drumbeat in the background! i am totally baffled by all of this.
Thanks Demi and Anon…glad to have the different points of view.
I love the picture. It really is sculptural.
I feel torn on how I feel. I think the picture look like a work of art and hey I’ll slap it on a t-shirt and wear it. At the same time this quote hit home:
“Placing it on the cover of PW gave it a whole different context of exclusion, of marginalization and ‘these are books by black people’ and not of ‘writers.’ ”
I think for some people an afro represents an image of some 70′s angry black woman. To me it represents women with natural hair that are happy and loving.
I can see why people would be offended if this was the *only* time that this publishing magazine were to highlight black authors. However do we know for sure that this magazine doesn’t already feature black authors in their regular issues along with authors of other races/ethnicities, and maybe this time they did an “all black authors” issue?
If this is the only time they’d highlight black authors yes, it’s offensive. If it’s just a special issue, and they also include black authors in their normal reportage, then it’s not such a bad thing.
I saw this magazine lying around in the mailroom at work. When I saw the picture, I grabbed it and ran back to my desk. I was intrigued by the cover and felt compelled to read the article. I just don’t understand why everything has to generate negative comments. I would love to know if these individuals with the comments took the time out to actually open the magazine and try to understand the point of the cover.
I really like the photo i see nothing wrong it at all. I think it’s very creative. i didn’t even think about the fact that she was naked maybe people are just too sensitive it’s not she’s standing there in booty shorts with her butt outside.And what about her says tribal? I couldn’t even read all the comments on that link seriously how are they getting all this voodoo stuff out of one picture. i feel bad for them cause someone probably wrote to them saying my ppl aren’t represented and they decided to rep blk authors found a picture they thought was cool and probably even consulted some blk person to make sure it was okay and then this happens. Sad
sorry for my super long comment I’m just mystified by the reaction some people have to this photo.